<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hakia Semantic Search API</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mendicantbug.com/2008/06/21/hakia-semantic-search-api/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mendicantbug.com/2008/06/21/hakia-semantic-search-api/</link>
	<description>Wanderings into computational linguistics, science, social media and life...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Adams</title>
		<link>http://mendicantbug.com/2008/06/21/hakia-semantic-search-api/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Adams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ealdent.wordpress.com/?p=652#comment-903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment!  We appear to agree on a lot. :)

Hakia is definitely going to give Google a run for its money in terms of quality, but whether they will be able to rival them in any business sense is unlikely.

I saw a comment somewhere (maybe TechCrunch?) saying the API key is optional, so the fact that you can back that up is good confirmation.  I guess they just use it to keep track of what it&#039;s being used for when they can.  Kind of odd, but whatever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment!  We appear to agree on a lot. :)</p>
<p>Hakia is definitely going to give Google a run for its money in terms of quality, but whether they will be able to rival them in any business sense is unlikely.</p>
<p>I saw a comment somewhere (maybe TechCrunch?) saying the API key is optional, so the fact that you can back that up is good confirmation.  I guess they just use it to keep track of what it&#8217;s being used for when they can.  Kind of odd, but whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CEO of NJ multimedia firm</title>
		<link>http://mendicantbug.com/2008/06/21/hakia-semantic-search-api/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CEO of NJ multimedia firm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ealdent.wordpress.com/?p=652#comment-901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an entrepreneur, I also like seeing new tech startups. I have sampled hakia&#039;s tools, and I&#039;m quite impressed with what they&#039;re doing over there. (I&#039;m seriously considering asking them for a job!)  And I agree with you: I take TechCrunch - or any other people&#039;s opinions about my work - with a grain of salt. Like Ayn Rand said (and I don&#039;t particularly care for her philosophy all that much) very often the innovators must stand alone, in the face of harsh criticism from lesser minds, with nothing but the candelight of their dreams to light their way. 

I have degrees in philosophy and have done extensive studies in Jungian linguistics, so I absolutely LOVE anything dealing with semantics and IR systems. I think hakia promises to rival Google in the future. (Well, I don&#039;t really think that, but I certainly hope so! Google&#039;s bastion of Ph.D&#039;s/M.B.A.&#039;s are already working to perfect and patent new semantic machine languages and search algorithms - and even if hakia beats them to the punch, Google will probably just buy them out. But as an entrepreneur, I can still have my dreams. 

Incidentally, I figured out how to add the hakia search bar onto &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnosisarts.com/m0rpheme.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one of our SEO pagesg&lt;/a&gt;, without having yet received the API key. (I probably shouldn&#039;t say that out loud. But in my defense, I did email them for the key, a while ago, but no one responded.)

At any rate, I&#039;m rambling. In sum, I personally find hakia stimulating, fascinating, educational and innovative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an entrepreneur, I also like seeing new tech startups. I have sampled hakia&#8217;s tools, and I&#8217;m quite impressed with what they&#8217;re doing over there. (I&#8217;m seriously considering asking them for a job!)  And I agree with you: I take TechCrunch &#8211; or any other people&#8217;s opinions about my work &#8211; with a grain of salt. Like Ayn Rand said (and I don&#8217;t particularly care for her philosophy all that much) very often the innovators must stand alone, in the face of harsh criticism from lesser minds, with nothing but the candelight of their dreams to light their way. </p>
<p>I have degrees in philosophy and have done extensive studies in Jungian linguistics, so I absolutely LOVE anything dealing with semantics and IR systems. I think hakia promises to rival Google in the future. (Well, I don&#8217;t really think that, but I certainly hope so! Google&#8217;s bastion of Ph.D&#8217;s/M.B.A.&#8217;s are already working to perfect and patent new semantic machine languages and search algorithms &#8211; and even if hakia beats them to the punch, Google will probably just buy them out. But as an entrepreneur, I can still have my dreams. </p>
<p>Incidentally, I figured out how to add the hakia search bar onto <a href="http://www.gnosisarts.com/m0rpheme.html" rel="nofollow">one of our SEO pagesg</a>, without having yet received the API key. (I probably shouldn&#8217;t say that out loud. But in my defense, I did email them for the key, a while ago, but no one responded.)</p>
<p>At any rate, I&#8217;m rambling. In sum, I personally find hakia stimulating, fascinating, educational and innovative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

