The North American Computational Linguistics Olympiad is an annual competition open to US high school students that introduces kids to computational linguistics at a much younger age than people normally hear about it. I didn’t hear about CL until I was three years into my undergrad program. The instant I did hear about it, I knew I wanted to do it. Most people I talk to about it, look like I’ve just uttered a phrase of Klingon. I suspect most people don’t hear about it at all, or if they do, it’s sometime during their undergrad program and not at the beginning, when they might be better able to plan their educational career path. Also, CL is pretty much a graduate program and rarely taught before then. Granted, a lot of the maths involved are beyond what’s taught to high school students and early undergrads, but the linguistics is not. And thinking about linguistics computationally is not. So NACLO is doing an extremely valuable service which I support completely. And not just because one of my professors is one of the General Chairs of the organizing committee for it. She no longer can affect my grade and I have no need to suck up — so this is genuine. How’s that for full disclosure?
One of my google alerts popped up a post on a spam blog I tracked down to this original post, which talks about a lot of young kids doing some great things in science. In the post is an interview with last year’s winner, Adam Hesterberg. He said, “I’d never studied linguistics, and ‘computation’ sounded like boring calculation.” That reminded me of the fact that computation might mean a different thing for most people than it does for scientists. I’m no corpus linguist, so I’m not gonna try to find out right here. What I suspect is that computation has a more “hard work” connotation for people outside of science: it’s the “plugging and chugging” meaning. Inside science, it’s tacked onto the beginning of some other field to mean anything in that field that can be computed. Computational linguistics deals with the computable aspects of linguistic theories. A very quick search on wikipedia finds at least a dozen other computational fields:
- Computational biology
- Computational chemistry
- Computational economics
- Computational electromagnetics
- Computational engineering
- Computational finance
- Computational fluid dynamics
- Computational mathematics
- Computational mechanics
- Computational particle physics
- Computational physics
- Computational statistics
Is it a good idea to use this name when approaching high school students? What about language technologies? Well, the competition isn’t about language technologies, it’s about critical problem solving in a linguistics setting. And trying to fit that into a competition name isn’t going to work, either. North American Critical Problem Solving about Linguistics Olympiad (NACPSLO)? It makes me think of narcolepsy.
So my proposal is North American Logic and Language Olympiad (NALLO). It’s easy to say (rhymes with hallow) and accurately describes the subject matter. Plus, I think it has broader appeal. A lot of kids are interested in logic, language, or both. It shakes free of the negative connotation of computation and draws kids where they can be introduced to it a little more easily. The downside is that it doesn’t mention linguistics directly, so that might trouble some people who are a little more traditional about their outreach.
What do you think?
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
24 June 2008 at 08:36:09
Chris
I’m all for getting more kids into any kind of linguistics, computational or otherwise. If a naming convention change does that, you have my vote.
24 June 2008 at 08:45:25
Jason Adams
Hmm, now I’m curious if the name matters at all — I just assumed it did. I suppose branding matters a lot since businesses spend millions on it. Does that apply to high school academic competitions?
29 August 2008 at 09:17:28
Kyle
Just saw this post, and thought I’d add my two cents.
Like past linguistics competitions, it offers many problems that require only logic to solve. However, unlike past ones, it focuses on computational linguistics. For example, here’s one problem on finite-state transducers:
http://www.naclo.cs.cmu.edu/assets/problems/FST1.pdf
Any student, though, who is turned off by the word “computational” is probably not going to know or care what “linguistics” is at all. I’d argue that this branding issue is going to matter less for those high school students who would be interested in academic competitions. Call me elitist, but those competing in difficult competitions like USAMO and USABO and NACLO are going to be the creme of the crop, the students who are curious and don’t look at only the face value of something such as NACLO (its name, in this case).
As a recent high school graduate intending to major in computer science and linguistics with a focus in CL, I can say definitely that its name has appeal to many students. I’ll admit that it’s a mouthful: at meetings where the hosts would give a brief summary of my activities, everyone would have this “wtf?” look when they heard them say “the North American Computational Linguistics Olympiad.” Hell, as I tried to get students interested in competing, I’d say the full name, and then immediately add, “or in other words, a language competition.” (I’ll add that a great many students–100+–responded positively to NACLO at my school.)
The only problem I see with the name “NACLO” is that it’s confused with the chemical NaClO in google searches. ;)
15 October 2008 at 22:29:54
NACLO 2009 « The Mendicant Bug
[...] to increase interest in general and computational linguistics. I’ve talked about it before here. RSS [...]